Apprenticeship
#1
Posted 19 May 2009 - 05:17 AM
We also had to do about 75 hours of practice teaching on students and family and friends, 30 observation hours, and 45 physical review hours. But it wasn't considered to be a part of the apprenticeship.
Still, though, that's a lot less than you guys have to do. So tell me: what does your apprenticeship entail?
ETA: I just checked and I got my hours totally wrong.
140 hours instruction & supervised teaching
Minimum 30 hours observation
Minimum 110 hours physical review
Minimum 65 hours practice teaching
100 hours apprenticeship performed upon completion
#2
Posted 19 May 2009 - 05:26 AM
#3
Posted 19 May 2009 - 06:38 AM
#4
Posted 19 May 2009 - 06:54 AM
#5
Posted 19 May 2009 - 08:02 AM
During private lessons, we didn't really assist but depending on the client, the teacher would ask, "what do you notice about her body here?" or "what do you think I should give this client?"
#6
Posted 19 May 2009 - 08:34 PM
It's one of the main reasons I decided to recertify--I had no mentor (the studio owner did some of her training at the same time as me, and some of the instructor trainers had only been teaching a few years) and I really wanted someone with more experience to learn from, and I wanted the discipline of teaching under some really knowledgeable, watchful eyes. I'm just past 200 hours and I've learned more from the apprenticeship than anything else. I observe sessions, work out with the other apprentices, teach the instructors, take guinea-pig clients, and just generally spend time soaking up the nitty-gritty details, and it's amazingly worthwhile.
I think the main difference is that even though the Stott stuff is contemporary and modified, it wasn't (in my situation) upheld for what it was. I felt free to teach whatever I picked up from workshops, in whatever order I liked, mixing in whatever pieces of supplementary equipment I chose, and it ended up being a Stott-flavoured hybrid. Now I'm being held to a system which, while it's still adaptable and changes according to different bodies, is a recognisable system, and I feel like I'm learning it way more thoroughly. The apprentice hours are a huge part of that.
#7
Posted 20 May 2009 - 06:11 AM
A lot of my ITs had been doing Pilates for quite a long time - one had been an IT for 12 years and an instructor for years before that. But you're right, it is a newer method, so the instructors don't have decades of experience.
#8
Posted 20 May 2009 - 08:45 AM
#9
Posted 20 May 2009 - 12:19 PM
#10
Posted 20 May 2009 - 01:55 PM
#11
Posted 20 May 2009 - 03:40 PM
3/7 of my cohort were men, which is somewhat unusual, I'm told, but it made for a dynamic group AND there was only one dancer in the group. It was like "Pilates for the People" and I liked that. It was almost like summer camp as we spent 8-10 hours a day together, practicing, teaching, eating, studying, and laughing. We knew each other so well at the end that we could complete each other's sentences.
The tests were a nightmare and we all stressed about them. One little mistake and you fail and have to do additional hours before you're allowed to take it again. The final test was the real doozie -- you have to teach two people of different skill levels at the same time. Lots of nightmares about that one but it wasn't as bad as we'd all built it up to be. Glad I did it but I'd never want to do it again. And that was only one portion of the final exam!
#12
Posted 21 May 2009 - 12:29 AM
A lot of my ITs had been doing Pilates for quite a long time - one had been an IT for 12 years and an instructor for years before that. But you're right, it is a newer method, so the instructors don't have decades of experience.
One of my ITs had previously studied some with Romana, and one had years of experience in dance and had done years of Pilates, but yeah. The bulk of my training was with people with 3-5 years as ITs and they'd been certified not long before that. 3, 5, or 10 years is nothing to sneeze at, but it's nothing on 30+ years.
My experience doesn't generalise to all STOTT PILATES teachers, either. I'm sure it's very different in Toronto or one of the bigger certifying studios.
#13
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:15 AM
I liked that a lot of my ITs were also OTs or PTs and could bring different pieces of wisdom to the work, as well as give more information on what we can and can't do. My "injury bible" was huge even before I got out there and had to start researching!
#14
Posted 22 May 2009 - 05:38 AM
I liked that a lot of my ITs were also OTs or PTs and could bring different pieces of wisdom to the work, as well as give more information on what we can and can't do. My "injury bible" was huge even before I got out there and had to start researching!
Hi Emma,
You've started several discussions here that are key, I think (this and the IMX). And pilatesplace just asked about bridging different programs of study.
Starting from classical and integrating what the above "experts" have to say is different than starting out hearing that information and progressing into classical. I put no judgment on it at all, save one: personally, no matter how much of the "can't dos" I hear, I keep what is right with the body in focus.
This is where I believe the pilates community has gotten off track. It takes a while to shift someone's focus back to health after injury, but that was the name of the book: Return to Life. Always question the "cant dos." Always. If a teacher focuses on what's wrong, the client feels that, and that is projecting something different than JHPilates and many others had in mind, in my opinion.
-Carole : )
PCDB Blog
Poplar Street Studio, a Bodies Mind® Studio, Mill Valley, CA
Bodies Mind® website (includes info about Bodies Mind® Program of Study™)
#15
Posted 22 May 2009 - 07:26 AM
#16
Posted 22 May 2009 - 07:54 AM
I knew next to nothing compared to what I know now about anatomy, etc., when I started teaching. Seriously.
I was taught that if there is a problem, leave that area alone. It all balances out.
PTs brought in the idea of working site specific.
No way should a teacher be unaware of your issues; he/she needs to know, just not focus on it, and not handle it in the way a PT would. All I'm saying here is that it is a shift in focus and with it, in paradigm. Not what I want for pilates overall.
PCDB Blog
Poplar Street Studio, a Bodies Mind® Studio, Mill Valley, CA
Bodies Mind® website (includes info about Bodies Mind® Program of Study™)
#17
Posted 22 May 2009 - 11:33 AM
#18
Posted 22 May 2009 - 12:47 PM
#19
Posted 22 May 2009 - 12:48 PM
That's how I learned also.I was taught that if there is a problem, leave that area alone. It all balances out.
Nice! When I was an apprentice and had my first "special case" in a private session, I was so nervous. Would they get hurt? Would I mess up? And, OMG, I was being observed. The client definitely picked that up. The focus of the session became her shoulder and not so much what she was there to do. I learned a lot from that one. That's why we apprentice, no?If a teacher focuses on what's wrong, the client feels that, and that is projecting something different than JHPilates and many others had in mind, in my opinion.
#20
Posted 22 May 2009 - 12:51 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











